I read yet another b.s. gripe about Rachael Ray (interestingly, the so-called editorialist who wrote the crud wasn't even able to spell Rachael's name write, opting instead for "Rachel Ray.").
The gal apparently took a Rachael Ray cookbook, tried a recipe or two, decided she didn't like them and then decided it was surely impossible to do any of her 30 minute meals in under 30 minutes.
So, she took a handy friend who just happened to be a chef and put the 30 minute target to the test. Apparently, this culinary giant was unable to complete a pork stir-fry recipe within the allotted time, proving that Rachael Ray 30 Minute Meals are mere mythology.
I don't believe it. Here's why:
(1) I personally can complete numerous recipes from ther very same book in under 30 minutes.
(2) If I were really writing, researching, and testing this 30 minute Rachael Ray hypothesis, I would probably spell her name correctly.
(3) The presence of dear friend who happens to be a successful chef AND who is willing to dink around with some 30 minute recipe experiment seems unlikely.
Am I the only one who can accomplish simple meals in 30 minutes or less? I mean, are Rachael, not Rachel, Ray and I the only two? Give me a break.
I cannot prove that the little piece at westchesterweekly.com is nonsense, but I have a sneaking suspicion it is.
Care to read a hit piece directed toward the always yummo Rachael Ray? Here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You're certainly the only person I've seen claim to be able to not only match Rachael's 30-minute mark, but also beat it! Kudos to you.
I am new to her recipes, and so far I love them, but I suspect I am in the majority here. It's hard to meet come in at 30 minutes when you don't own a Cuisinart or have above average knife chopping skills.
Post a Comment